A community with too many signs, signs that are too large, have too much motion, too many flashing lights, are in poor locations, are too small to read, or are so large they are overpowering, is a community that not only functions poorly (there is too much clutter, making wayfinding, instruction and identification difficult), but also looks bad. If a community looks bad, then it is a less desirable place to be—to live, work or invest in.
Scenic Michigan is interested in helping local communities developing sign ordinances that enhance community aesthetics and protect the health, safety, and welfare of residents.
We are deeply concerned with the visual pollution and safety issues caused by the creep of static and digital billboards across our state. Deep-pocked and relentless billboard industry lobbyists patrol Lansing, working to undermine Michigan’s billboard rules, circumvent laws protecting our scenic waters and woodlands, and cannibalize Michigan’s beauty. Michigan, with 16,000 billboards, is second only to Florida in this dubious category of highway and community blight.
Four states—Alaska, Hawaii, Maine and Vermont—completely ban billboards, and an increasing number of cities—including Dallas, Houston, Little Rock, Jacksonville, Kansas City, Oakland and San Diego—are imposing bans on the construction of new billboards. Some Michigan communities have enacted bans on new billboards (such as the City of Holland and City of Troy) or have expressly capped the total number of billboards permitted in the community (including the City of Ann Arbor). In addition, since 2007, the Michigan Highway Advertising Act, 1972 PA 106, caps the number of billboards along state highways. Many other places, including Grand Rapids, have trade-off schemes to encourage the removal of older billboards and reduction of the total number of billboards in the community.
For more information about how to effectively and legally regulate billboards in your Michigan community, see Chapters 9 and 11 of our Sign Guidebook. You may also want to explore our google drive of recently amended Michigan sign ordinances to see different approaches to regulating billboards.
There is compelling evidence that digital billboards pose a safety risk to drivers. While billboard companies reject the claim, it should come as no surprise that a device that is intended to distract drivers for the purpose of advertising has some negative externalities. A 2014 study that analyzed over 55,000 crashes on Michigan’s roadways found that while the total number of crashes on Michigan’s highways decreased between 2004 and 2012, crashes increased on roadways where digital billboards had been introduced. Data provided by the Michigan Department of Transportation showed that there were nine percent fewer overall crashes in 2012 compared to 2004. Yet in areas where digital billboards had gone up crash rates increased, and rates were higher the closer one got to a digital billboard. A half-mile away from digital billboards crashes increased 2.3%, while at a quarter-mile away they went up 7%, and within a tenth of a mile the crash rates rose by 7.2%. “The proportions of digital billboard-proximal traffic crashes on Michigan freeways are significantly higher ‘after’ than ‘before’ the digital billboards were installed,” said Dr. Nadiya Fink, Assistant Professor at Albion College, who analyzed the data.
Scenic America has compiled a wealth of data on the subject of billboard safety that we encourage you to read through.
When a billboard must be removed (or simply moved) for a highway project, its owner often seeks compensation far in excess of the worth of the billboard structure itself. Excess and unwarranted compensation for billboard condemnation is just one way that American taxpayers unduly subsidize the billboard industry.
In September 2013 the Minnesota Department of Transportation agreed to spend over $4.3 million in public funds for the removal of a digital billboard as part of a bridge reconstruction project. The billboard’s removal was necessitated by a project currently underway to replace the Lafayette Bridge, which carries state highway 52 over the Mississippi River near downtown St. Paul. Documents reveal that the state paid the billboard’s owner, Clear Channel Outdoor, $4,321,000 for the condemnation of a single digital billboard. Clear Channel retained ownership of the billboard and is believed to have relocated the sign to Minneapolis soon after its removal.
We are excited to announce the beginning of our 2019 Photo Contest. This year we’re taking it up a notch and we have partnered with MLive to increase the visibility of the contest. We’re thrilled that we’ll be able to share the many amazing photos we receive with a broader…
Last night we presented Troy resident, Alec Peeples (Keep Troy Beautiful) and the City of Troy with Scenic Hero Awards! Thanks to good community organizing (following the permitting of 5 digital billboards in Troy) and a responsive City Council, the City of Troy adopted a new sign ordinance in 2018…
We have exciting news to report! Today, Governor Snyder vetoed SB 964. This bill, introduced by Senator Casperson, would have amended the Highway Advertising Act of 1972 solely to benefit the outdoor advertising industry and would have provided no public benefit. The final version of the bill even stripped provisions…
Last spring, Scenic Michigan and Keep Michigan Beautiful partnered together in a pilot project aimed at engaging high school students on the topic community design and placemaking. The City Beautiful essay contest, open to all high school juniors and seniors in Flint and Cheboygan, asked students to think and…
Scenic Michigan and Keep Michigan Beautiful are pleased to announce the launch of our City Beautiful Essay Contest. Each year, Scenic Michigan and Keep Michigan Beautiful plan to reach out to high school students around the state with the question “Does the appearance of your city matter?”. We want to…
This Michigan Sign Guidebook addresses local planning and regulation of nearly all types of exterior signs.
